Search Results

  1. Apr 2, 2024 · (a, b) The mean precisions of the top 50 contacts predicted by PLMGraph-Inter, GLINTER, DeepHomo2, CDPred, and DeepHomo on (a) DHTest and (b) DB5.5 when using experimental structures and AlphaFold2 predicted structures as the input, where the green lines indicate the performance of DRN-1D2D_Inter. (c) The performance gaps (measured as the ...

  2. Feb 9, 2023 · From Figure 2A and B, we can clearly see that DRN-1D2D_Inter significantly outperformed DeepHomo (P-value: 9.71e-4) and GLINTER (HomoPDB P-value: 9.87e-15, HeteroPDB P-value: 1.51e-8). We also show the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) of precisions of the top 50 predicted contacts by each method on the two datasets shown in ...

  3. People also ask

  4. Jun 1, 2021 · Air velocity profiles for the five investigated cyclones; a) designed, b)1D2D, c) 2D2D, d) 1D3D, e) 1D3D/w2D2D. At the same time, the minimum velocity can be measured in the conical section. In the lower region of the conic part (seed's outlet portion), the air velocity in the standard cyclones is still high over the designed cyclone.

    • Mahmoud A. El-Emam, Mahmoud A. El-Emam, Ling Zhou, Weidong Shi, Chen Han
    • 2021
  5. Apr 1, 2022 · Comparing Fig. 10 (b) and (c), the red line in (c) is overall higher than the line in (b), indicating that for an inlet velocity variation period of 0.4 s (ω = 5π), a larger A leads to a more pronounced disadvantage of the 1D2D cyclone. This is because the increased inlet velocity leads to a higher air velocity vertically up the vortex finder ...

  6. Mar 1, 2006 · This new theoretical analysis of cyclone pressure drop for 1D2D, 2D2D, and 1D3D cyclones was tested against measured data at different inlet velocities and gave excellent agreement. The results ...

  7. Jan 3, 2006 · Within each block, blanks will be run for all cyclones in which the cyclones will b e operated as previously . ... Wang, L., C.B. Parnell and B.W. Shaw. 2000. 1D2D, 1D3D, 2D2D cyclone fractional ...

  8. ( See tables 3, 5, 10, 12, 17, and 19.) There was no cycling lint effect on 1D2D emission concentrations. For trash B ( low lint fiber / bulky trash ) and trash E ( large trash without lint fiber ), the 1D2D cyclone design had higher emission concentrations for both the1.5 g/m3 fine dust inlet loading and the 15 g/m3 total trash inlet loading.